Re: zig()

["wdbaker8" <wdbaker8@xxxx>]

I just realized that the diagram I tried to do didn't work so well, 
but if you go and try to reply you will be able to see it fine.

thanks
wdbaker

--- In amibroker@xxxx, "wdbaker8" <wdbaker8@xxxx> wrote:
> In using zig for support resistance, the first line is not stable 
but 
> the second line back is stable, is this a correct assumption. 
> example:
> 
> p2 p1
> - - 
> - - - p
> - - - -
> - - - -
> - -
> t2 t1
> 
> 
> 
> current peak or "p" is not stable???
> peak(close,1,1) or p1 is stable
> peak(close,1,2) or p2 is stable
> trough(close,1,1) or t1 is stable???
> trough(close,1,2) or t2 is stable
> 
> Would these assumptions be correct?
> 
> Thanks
> wdbaker