|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Dave,
Please post the code you are using ... I am still experimenting.
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: david346 [mailto:david346@x...]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 2:02 PM
To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [amibroker] Re: Point & Figure Chart in AFL
PETER,
look what we got !!!suprise,suprise
could you do me favor while expermenting
could you check the code from "revised"
formula for pnf help file,get error mes
line 2,char 1,err:0-object expected,
unknown identifier line 84 col 15
pfo= ref( pfo ,
copied this exactly,still get err
need i just add graphstyle to your
"pnf" or should i just and WAIT to
YOU FIGURE what's BEST to pnf charting
as usual thanks for your time
dave
In amibroker@xxxx, "bluesinvestor" <investor@xxxx> wrote:
> Tomasz,
>
> Thank you very much! I am experimenting and might have some
questions a
> little bit later.
>
> Peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tomasz Janeczko [mailto:amibroker@x...]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 11:21 AM
> To: amibroker@xxxx
> Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: Point & Figure Chart in AFL
>
>
> Peter,
>
> Now with 4.07.0 it is possible - see ReadMe accompanying the new
version.
>
> Best regards,
> Tomasz Janeczko
> amibroker.com
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "bluesinvestor" <investor@xxxx>
> To: <amibroker@xxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 3:50 AM
> Subject: RE: [amibroker] Re: Point & Figure Chart in AFL
>
>
> > Dave,
> >
> > The attachment that had Xs and Os was not AmiBroker ... AB
doesn't have
> that
> > functionality (yet?)
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: david346 [mailto:david346@x...]
> > Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 8:00 PM
> > To: amibroker@xxxx
> > Subject: [amibroker] Re: Point & Figure Chart in AFL
> >
> >
> > hi mirat+ peter,
> > how did you guys get ambi to disply
> > the fancy "x" + "o"?saw this on an attach
> > going around was it just the attach not
> > ambi!tell me this is not so????
> > thanks dave
> > In amibroker@xxxx, "bluesinvestor" <investor@xxxx> wrote:
> > > Hello Mirat,
> > >
> > > I have not looked too much into your boxsize calculation, so I
> > can't comment
> > > on how well it works. If you look at the reply I sent to
Richard,
> > it
> > > appears that Bollinger had similar thoughts on boxsize.
> > >
> > > I do know that the methods presented on dorseywright.com and
> > stockcharts.com
> > > have been the traditional methods.
> > >
> > > As far as reversal goes, again 3 box reversal is traditional.
You
> > can
> > > experiment with changing this value but I have no experience
with
> > non
> > > traditional values.
> > >
> > > In other words I have not tested enough to see if there is any
> > merit to
> > > changing the traditional philosophy. It may be worth a look.
Let
> > me know
> > > if you find anything interesting.
> > >
> > > Peter
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: mirat_dave [mailto:mirat_dave@x...]
> > > Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 10:31 AM
> > > To: amibroker@xxxx
> > > Subject: [amibroker] Re: Point & Figure Chart in AFL
> > >
> > >
> > > Thank you all for your comments and kind words.
> > >
> > > In the original script that I wrote, I used the Box scaling
> > suggested
> > > on StockCharts.com. It worked well; my script produced charts
> > almost
> > > identical to those on that site.
> > >
> > > The reason I changed the method of calculating the Box size is
that
> > I
> > > follow a number of stocks that have seen a trading range over
the
> > > past few years of $4 - $200 or more extreme. I also follow the
> > > market indicies which are in the thousands. In addition, I
wanted
> > to
> > > be able to switch between ^DJI, MMM, IBM, MSFT, AOL, HPQ, and
others
> > > without manually changing the Box size.
> > >
> > > Traditionally, the Box and Reversal values are set at the
outset and
> > > not changed during the plot of a single stock. In my case,
since
> > > stock prices have changed dramatically, I wanted to dynamcially
vary
> > > the Box size as the stock price changed to produce a finer
chart.
> > >
> > > The values suggested below and those on the stockcharst.com site
> > are,
> > > of course, the more widely used and accepted values.
> > >
> > > For the curious, the number 7.3374 and more accurately these
> > > calculations:
> > > Box = ((tot[i]/(i+1))^.5)/7.3374;
> > > Reverse = Box * 3;
> > >
> > > came from an attempt to use the Box values on the
stockcharts.com
> > > site. The formula tries to dynamically calculate the Box sizes
such
> > > that they correspond to the following.
> > >
> > > Price Range Box Size
> > > Under $0.25 .0625
> > > .26 to 1.00 .125
> > > 1.01 to 5 .25
> > > 5.01 to 20 .50
> > > 20.01 to 100 1.00
> > > 100.01 to 200 2.00
> > > 200.01 to 500 4.00
> > > 500.01 to 1,000 5.00
> > > 1,000.01 to 25,000 50.00
> > > 25,000.01 and up 500.00
> > >
> > > Preference/bias was toward being more accurate on the Box sizes
> > > corresponding the stock prices equal to and under $100.
> > >
> > > I have a question, by varying the Box and reversal values am I
doing
> > > more harm than good in the resulting PnF analysis?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Mirat
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In amibroker@xxxx, "bluesinvestor" <investor@xxxx> wrote:
> > > > I think I should elaborate on my last email ... the is the
> > > traditional scale
> > > > used in PnF.dll:
> > > >
> > > > Price Range Box Size
> > > > 0.00 to 5.00 .25
> > > > 5.01 to 20.00 .50
> > > > 20.01 to 100.00 1.00
> > > > Over 100.00 2.00
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > But if anyone sees a reason to change this let me know.
> > > >
> > > > Peter
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: bluesinvestor [mailto:investor@x...]
> > > > Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 5:11 PM
> > > > To: amibroker@xxxx
> > > > Subject: RE: [amibroker] Re: Point & Figure Chart in AFL
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Richard,
> > > >
> > > > From
> > >
http://stockcharts.com/education/How/AnalysisTools/pnfCharts.html:
> > > >
> > > > Traditional box scaling preloads box sizes historically
used for
> > > that
> > > > particular price range. The reversal amount starts at 2 (this
> > > should be 3),
> > > > but can be adjusted dynamically. Here are the traditional box
> > sizes
> > > used in
> > > > our charts:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Price Range Box Size
> > > > Under $0.25 .0625
> > > > .26 to 1.00 .125
> > > > 1.01 to 5.00 .25
> > > > 5.01 to 20.00 .50
> > > > 20.01 to 100.00 1.00
> > > > 100.01 to 200.00 2.00
> > > > 200.01 to 500.00 4.00
> > > > 500.01 to 1,000.00 5.00
> > > > 1,000.01 to 25,000.00 50.00
> > > > 25,000.01 and up 500.00
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The traditional scaling in PnF.dll only uses .25 (less than
$5)
> > > up to 2
> > > > (greater than $100) because I have been a student of Dorsey
Wright
> > > long
> > > > before StockCharts came along, but the DLL can change when
and if
> > > needed.
> > > > Plus you have the ability to use your own boxsize in the DLL.
> > > >
> > > > Peter
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Richard Alford [mailto:richard.alford@x...]
> > > > Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 4:59 PM
> > > > To: amibroker@xxxx
> > > > Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: Point & Figure Chart in AFL
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Looks great, Peter. Can you elaborate on what is meant
by the
> > > > traditional scaling? "x = Boxsize (use '0' for traditional
> > scaling)
> > > or
> > > > provide a reference. I was checking out Kaufman and I
couldn't
> > > find a
> > > > recommended box size.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Richard
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: bluesinvestor
> > > > To: amibroker@xxxx
> > > > Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 3:29 PM
> > > > Subject: RE: [amibroker] Re: Point & Figure Chart in AFL
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Forgot to mention:
> > > >
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/message/17288
> > > >
> > > > For PnF.dll information.
> > > >
> > > > Peter
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: bluesinvestor [mailto:investor@x...]
> > > > Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 4:23 PM
> > > > To: amibroker@xxxx
> > > > Subject: RE: [amibroker] Re: Point & Figure Chart in
AFL
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hello Mirat,
> > > >
> > > > Good stuff!! I made some modifications to your code
to
> > > call my
> > > > Point & Figure DLL and plot the data using your jscript
code. I
> > > tested it
> > > > on one stock (PYPL - short history) and it looks correct
(except
> > > for the
> > > > beginning bars:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I have attached the AFL to this email (and posted
below
> > for
> > > Yahoo
> > > > viewers).
> > > >
> > > > Thanks again,
> > > > Peter
> > > >
> > > > // PF Chart by Mirat Dave
> > > >
> > > > // Copy and paste this as a custom indicator.
> > > >
> > > > x=calcPnF(0,3);
> > > >
> > > > EnableScript("jscript");
> > > >
> > > > <%
> > > >
> > > > PnFValue = VBArray( AFL( "PnFVal" ) ).toArray();
> > > >
> > > > PnFColumn = VBArray( AFL( "PnFCol" ) ).toArray();
> > > >
> > > > // Calculate running average stock price for use in
> > > calculating the
> > > > Box size.
> > > >
> > > > PFO = new Array();
> > > >
> > > > PFC = new Array();
> > > >
> > > > // initialize first element
> > > >
> > > > j = 0;
> > > >
> > > > PFO[j] = PnFValue[0];
> > > >
> > > > PFC[j] = PnFValue[0];
> > > >
> > > > // perform the loop that produces PF Chart
> > > >
> > > > for( i = 1; i < PnFValue.length; i++ )
> > > >
> > > > {
> > > >
> > > > if ( PnFColumn[i] == 0 )
> > > >
> > > > {
> > > >
> > > > if( PnFColumn[i] == 0 && PnFColumn[i-1] == 0)
> > > >
> > > > {
> > > >
> > > > PFC[j] = PnFValue[i];
> > > >
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > if( PnFColumn[i] == 0 && PnFColumn[i-1] != 0 )
> > > >
> > > > {
> > > >
> > > > j++;
> > > >
> > > > PFC[j] = PnFValue[i];
> > > >
> > > > PFO[j] = PnFValue[i-1];
> > > >
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > else
> > > >
> > > > {
> > > >
> > > > if (PnFColumn[i] == 1)
> > > >
> > > > {
> > > >
> > > > if( PnFColumn[i] == 1 && PnFColumn[i-1] == 1 )
> > > >
> > > > {
> > > >
> > > > PFC[j] = PnFValue[i];
> > > >
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > if( PnFColumn[i] == 1 && PnFColumn[i-1] != 1 )
> > > >
> > > > {
> > > >
> > > > j++;
> > > >
> > > > PFO[j] = PnFValue[i-1];
> > > >
> > > > PFC[j] = PnFValue[i];
> > > >
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > // Shift chart to the right to eliminate trailing
empty
> > data
> > > >
> > > > // - PF charts are generally smaller/shorter then the
full
> > > stock
> > > > charts because they lack a time scale.
> > > >
> > > > delta = PnFValue.length - PFO.length;
> > > >
> > > > for( i = PnFValue.length; i > delta; i-- )
> > > >
> > > > {
> > > >
> > > > PFO[ i-1 ] = PFO[ i-delta-1];
> > > >
> > > > PFC[ i-1 ] = PFC[ i-delta-1];
> > > >
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > for( i = 0; i < delta; i++)
> > > >
> > > > {
> > > >
> > > > PFO[ i-1 ] = 0;
> > > >
> > > > PFC[ i-1 ] = 0;
> > > >
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > AFL.Var("delta") = delta;
> > > >
> > > > AFL.Var("length") = PnFValue.length;
> > > >
> > > > AFL.Var("PFO") = PFO;
> > > >
> > > > AFL.Var("PFC") = PFC;
> > > >
> > > > %>
> > > >
> > > > O = PFO;
> > > >
> > > > C = PFC;
> > > >
> > > > H = (O+C)/2;
> > > >
> > > > L = (O+C)/2;
> > > >
> > > > GraphXSpace = 9;
> > > >
> > > > Graph0Style = 64;
> > > >
> > > > Graph0Color =1;
> > > >
> > > > Graph0 = C;
> > > >
> > > > Filter=C>0;
> > > >
> > > > AddColumn(PFO,"PFO");
> > > >
> > > > AddColumn(PFC,"PFC");
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: mirat_dave [mailto:mirat_dave@x...]
> > > > Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 10:00 AM
> > > > To: amibroker@xxxx
> > > > Subject: [amibroker] Re: Point & Figure Chart in AFL
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hello Richard and Dimitris,
> > > >
> > > > Sorry to have caused so much confusion.
> > > >
> > > > Since most stocks since 2000 have been trending down,
you
> > > may get a
> > > > only a few bars because the P&F Chart ignores small up
> > > moves and
> > > > only
> > > > extends down bars when the price moves more than the
box
> > > size.
> > > > Since
> > > > 2000, you may very well have only a few bars. Try
loading
> > > more data
> > > > for at least one stock.
> > > >
> > > > I used AmiQuote and Yahoo for the data. I have data
from
> > > January
> > > > 1994. The AmiBroker version on which I created this
file
> > > is 4.0.0
> > > > Apr 26 2002.
> > > >
> > > > I do not know if the AmiBroker version is causing the
> > > difference. I
> > > > saw that it worked for Richard on MSFT (although I am
not
> > > sure what
> > > > the whole MSFT v. MSFT issue was - it seems to have
> > resolved
> > > > itself). Perhaps Richard also has more data loaded.
> > > >
> > > > As you can see from the script, it is very simple. If
> > > problems
> > > > continue, I would be happy to go through it in detail
to
> > > see if
> > > > there
> > > > is a coding error.
> > > >
> > > > I'm afraid I have no other explanation other than more
> > > data. Let's
> > > > try that first.
> > > >
> > > > Mirat
> > > >
> > > > PS I would post .gifs of my charts but I do not know
how
> > > to attach
> > > > a
> > > > file to my reply. Although that would not help
resolve
> > the
> > > issue.
> > > > :-)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In amibroker@xxxx, "Richard Alford"
> > > <richard.alford@xxxx> wrote:
> > > > > I am just isolating variables. If we have the same
> > > program and
> > > > version (4.06.1 Jun 19 build), the same indicator code
> > > (this I
> > > > confirmed) and same data we should get the same
result.
> > (I
> > > continue
> > > > to believe in deterministic computing - probably
naive in
> > > light of
> > > > Microsoft!). The questionable variable, and a big
one, is
> > > the data
> > > > source - I use qp2. Perhaps someone using yahoo could
> > > compare to
> > > > your results?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > It does appear that the "box size", the significant
> > > change that
> > > > defines an X or O in my understanding, should be
> > normalized
> > > to the
> > > > price of the instrument to account for the difference
in
> > > WCOME
> > > > pricing vs. DJIA, for example. I am referring to the
code
> > > fragment:
> > > > >
> > > > > // Calculate PF Chart Box size and minimum Reverse
> > values
> > > > > // Box = ((tot[i]/(i+1))^.5)/7.3374;
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > >
> > > > > Richard
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: dtsokakis
> > > > > To: amibroker@xxxx
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 2:49 PM
> > > > > Subject: [amibroker] Re: Point & Figure Chart in
AFL
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Richard,
> > > > > YHOO via Amiquote.
> > > > > Why do you think it is a matter of data provider ?
> > > > > Dimitris Tsokakis
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In amibroker@xxxx, "Richard Alford"
> > > <richard.alford@xxxx>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > but the point remains that you and I get
different
> > > results.
> > > > what
> > > > > is your data source?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Richard
> > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > From: dtsokakis
> > > > > > To: amibroker@xxxx
> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 1:47 PM
> > > > > > Subject: [amibroker] Re: Point & Figure Chart
in
> > AFL
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Richard,
> > > > > > ANY other function works just fine with my
> > valuable
> > > > Amibroker
> > > > > 4.06.
> > > > > > Just fine.
> > > > > > I can not see the reason for this P&F script.
> > > > > > Anyway, the author perhaps could expain.
> > > > > > Dimitris Tsokakis
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In amibroker@xxxx, "Richard Alford"
> > > > <richard.alford@xxxx>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > DT, I agree it was not easy to understand.
The
> > > attached
> > > > charts
> > > > > > showed the TWO results that were generated
> > whenever
> > > I
> > > > entered
> > > > the
> > > > > > symbol MSFT - it appears to be a fluke and I
> > cannot
> > > > reproduce
> > > > it
> > > > > any
> > > > > > longer. Although there is not ticker name in
the
> > > formula,
> > > > there
> > > > > was
> > > > > > strange behavior occurring for MSFT and MSFT
only
> > > at that
> > > > time.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The gist of my reply to you was that using
the
> > > SAME code
> > > > as
> > > > you
> > > > > > posted and using the code I copied from the
files
> > > sections,
> > > > I
> > > > > > generated the same results - and not the
results
> > > that you
> > > > were
> > > > > > creating. That suggests that you have a
problem
> > in
> > > your
> > > > data
> > > > > and/or
> > > > > > setup. The only reason for the two codes was
to
> > > guarantee
> > > > that
> > > > > there
> > > > > > wasn't a subtle error - there was not.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Sorry for adding the confusion about the
MSFT
> > > fluke at the
> > > > same
> > > > > > time.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Richard
> > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > From: dtsokakis
> > > > > > > To: amibroker@xxxx
> > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 12:47 AM
> > > > > > > Subject: [amibroker] Re: Point & Figure
Chart
> > > in AFL
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Richard,
> > > > > > > It is not easy to understand this
> > > > > > > "the plot for MSFT changes when one
changes
> > the
> > > symbol
> > > > go
> > > > > MSFT
> > > > > > from
> > > > > > > MSFT??? "
> > > > > > > I copied the formula from
> > > > > > >
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/Point-Figure
> > > > > > > pasted in my Ind. builder and get the
posted
> > > gifs.
> > > > > > > No ticker name is into the formula.
> > > > > > > What is "the two MSFT " ???
> > > > > > > Do you use the same code from the above
> > > address??
> > > > > > > DT
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In amibroker@xxxx, "Richard Alford"
> > > > <richard.alford@xxxx>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > Those are not the figures I generate
using
> > > the code in
> > > > > > the "files
> > > > > > > section". (Why wasn't this put in the AFL
> > > library is a
> > > > > question
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > > my mind???)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Just noticed that the plot for MSFT
changes
> > > when one
> > > > > changes
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > symbol go MSFT from MSFT??? Not the case
for
> > > AMZN or
> > > > ORCL?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I attached the two MSFT for comparison,
one
> > > is "my"
> > > > copy,
> > > > > and
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > other is a copy and paste of the code in
your
> > > note. The
> > > > > > difference
> > > > > > > is the quirk in MSFT, not an error in the
code
> > > you have
> > > > used.
> > > > > And
> > > > > > DT
> > > > > > > do you really like black on blue borders?
> > > Personally, I
> > > > can
> > > > > > never
> > > > > > > read your chart titles.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Richard
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > > From: Dimitris Tsokakis
> > > > > > > > To: amibroker@xxxx
> > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 1:14 PM
> > > > > > > > Subject: [amibroker] Re: Point &
Figure
> > > Chart in AFL
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Mirat,
> > > > > > > > Here is P&F charts for AMZN, MSFT and
> > ORCL.
> > > > > > > > Data since Jan 2000.
> > > > > > > > Is it the expected picture ?
> > > > > > > > The code, copied from files section
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > // PF Chart by Mirat Dave
> > > > > > > > // Copy and paste this as a custom
> > > indicator.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > EnableScript("jscript");
> > > > > > > > <%
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > High = VBArray( AFL
( "High" ) ).toArray();
> > > > > > > > Low = VBArray( AFL( "Low" ) ).toArray
();
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > // Calculate running average stock
price
> > > for use in
> > > > > > calculating
> > > > > > > the Box size.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > tot = new Array();
> > > > > > > > tot[0] = (High[0] + Low[0])/2;
> > > > > > > > for( i=1; i < High.length; i++ )
> > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > tot[i] = tot[i-1] + ((High[i] + Low
> > [i])/2);
> > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > PFO = new Array();
> > > > > > > > PFC = new Array();
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > // initialize first element
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > j = 0;
> > > > > > > > PFO[j] = High[0];
> > > > > > > > PFC[j] = Low[0];
> > > > > > > > down = 1; // By default the first bar
is a
> > > down bar.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > up = 0;
> > > > > > > > swap = 0;
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > // perform the loop that produces PF
Chart
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > for( i = 1; i < High.length; i++ )
> > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > // Calculate PF Chart Box size and
minimum
> > > Reverse
> > > > values
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Box = ((tot[i]/(i+1))^.5)/7.3374;
> > > > > > > > Reverse = Box * 3;
> > > > > > > > if( Low[i] < PFC[j] - Box && down)
> > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > PFC[j] = Low[i];
> > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > else
> > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > if( High[i] >= PFC[j] + Reverse &&
down)
> > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > j++;
> > > > > > > > swap = 1;
> > > > > > > > PFO[j] = Low[i];
> > > > > > > > PFC[j] = High[i];
> > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > if( High[i] > PFC[j] + Box && up)
> > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > PFC[j] = High[i];
> > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > else
> > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > if( Low[i] <= PFC[j] - Reverse && up)
> > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > j++;
> > > > > > > > PFC[j] = Low[i];
> > > > > > > > PFO[j] = High[i];
> > > > > > > > swap = 1;
> > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > if( swap )
> > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > swap = 0;
> > > > > > > > if( up )
> > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > up = 0;
> > > > > > > > down = 1;
> > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > else
> > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > up = 1;
> > > > > > > > down = 0;
> > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > // Shift chart to the right to
eliminate
> > > trailing
> > > > empty
> > > > > data
> > > > > > > > // - PF charts are generally
> > > smaller/shorter then
> > > > the
> > > > > full
> > > > > > stock
> > > > > > > charts because they lack a time scale.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > delta = High.length - PFO.length;
> > > > > > > > for( i = High.length; i > delta; i-- )
> > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > PFO[ i-1 ] = PFO[ i-delta-1];
> > > > > > > > PFC[ i-1 ] = PFC[ i-delta-1];
> > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > for( i = 0; i < delta; i++)
> > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > PFO[ i-1 ] = 0;
> > > > > > > > PFC[ i-1 ] = 0;
> > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > AFL.Var("PFO") = PFO;
> > > > > > > > AFL.Var("PFC") = PFC;
> > > > > > > > %>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > O = PFO;
> > > > > > > > C = PFC;
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > H = (O+C)/2;
> > > > > > > > L = (O+C)/2;
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > GraphXSpace = 9;
> > > > > > > > Graph0Style = 64;
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Graph0Color =1;
> > > > > > > > Graph0 = C;
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks in advance for any reply.
> > > > > > > > Dimitris Tsokakis
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Click here to find your contact
> > > lenses!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject
to
> > the
> > > Yahoo!
> > > > Terms
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > Service.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > > > > > > ADVERTISEMENT
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
the
> > > Yahoo! Terms
> > > > of
> > > > > > Service.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > > > > > ADVERTISEMENT
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
Yahoo!
> > > Terms of
> > > > > Service.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > > > > ADVERTISEMENT
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
> > > Terms of
> > > > Service.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups
> > > > Sponsor ---------------------~-->
> > > > Will You Find True Love?
> > > > Will You Meet the One?
> > > > Free Love Reading by phone!
> > > >
http://us.click.yahoo.com/O3jeVD/R_ZEAA/Ey.GAA/GHeqlB/TM
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------
----
> > --
> > > --------
> > > > -~->
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
Terms of
> > > Service.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of
> > > Service.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > > > ADVERTISEMENT
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> > > Service.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|