[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Tharp's Expectancy Calculation



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Hello Anthony,

That is how I calculated my expectancy of $937 in my earlier post. I 
am trying to whittle it down to get the expectancy per dollar 
risked. I'm starting to think I just take the results as is but I 
don't know the answer as to why.

Rob

--- In amibroker@xxxx, Anthony Faragasso <ajf1111@xxxx> wrote:
> Hello Rob,
> 
> Have you seen the formula for expectancy on Page 143 of Tharp's 
Book.
> 
> System has 90% winning trades, average winning trade is 275.00, and 
10%
> losing trades, average losing trade is 2,700.00:
> 
> Expectancy=(.90 * 275)-(.10*2700)=-22.5
> 
> The system although 90% winning trades is Negative Expectation.
> 
> Anthony
> 
> bowbie89 wrote:
> 
> > Hello Jerome,
> >
> > This was a test just on one stock(MSFT). I'm still not seeing 
this
> > clearly. My overall system expectancy is $937 by taking my net
> > profit and dividing it by the # of trades(31). I am risking 1% 
of my
> > equity as you can see in the code below -
> > Capital=100000;
> > risk=.01*Capital;
> > shares=risk/Max(2*ATR(10),2*ATR(3) );
> > PositionSize=shares*Ep;
> >
> > Total profits on winning trades(13) = 44,366
> > Total losses on losing trades(18) = 15,322
> >
> > >From the statistics printout my Avg Win/Avg Loss = 3.86
> > So Avg Win X Pct. Win - Avg. Loss X Pct. Loss = 1.04
> >
> > Yet it seems when I try to eliminate the position sizing effect to
> > get down to a per share basis, it seems to give me a negative
> > expectancy. It just seems like I should setup my probability 
matrix
> > and leave my gains & losses as is.
> >
> > Any more thoughts on this?
> >
> > Rob
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In amibroker@xxxx, "Silvarius" <silvarius@xxxx> wrote:
> > > Hello Rob,
> > >
> > > The method to divide your results by the number of shares is the
> > right one
> > > only if you test a system on a single security. If you test it 
on
> > multiple
> > > securities, you must make it on a basis that is commun to every
> > securities
> > > (money, percentage, indices etc ...).
> > >
> > > Best regards, Jerome ULRICH
> > > -----Message d'origine-----
> > > De : bowbie89 [mailto:robm@x...]
> > > Envoye : vendredi 21 juin 2002 05:15
> > > A : amibroker@xxxx
> > > Objet : [amibroker] Tharp's Expectancy Calculation
> > >
> > >
> > > Hello All,
> > >
> > > I was wondering if someone could help me out. I'm having 
trouble
> > > calculating expectancy based upon Tharp's book. I know
> > > I can calculate the expectancy from the statistic report 
using avg
> >
> > > win/avg loss but I wanted to follow Tharp's procedure.
> > > I just did a simple backtest on Microsoft and was trying to 
figure
> >
> > > out the expectancy based upon Tharp's "Trade Your
> > > Way To Financial Freedom" book. On page 158, his second step 
is
> > to
> > > eliminate the effect of position sizing by only
> > > considering single units or 100 share blocks. I think this is
> > where
> > > I'm having my problems. Am I supposed to divide my
> > > gains and losses by the number of shares and then times it by
> > 100? I
> > > did this but it just doesn't seem right. I wanted to
> > > attach my excel file but I don't think I have the rights to
> > upload it
> > > or I'm not seeing how to do it.
> > >
> > > Thanks for any help,
> > >
> > > Rob
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > > ADVERTISEMENT
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> > Service.
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
> 
> 
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of 
Service.