|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Ken and Rick,
Thank you.
AFAICT, visually there isn't much of a difference between this and the previous one
... (Afterall the new formular is just smoothed over 3 periods.) I guess I'll use my
standard (RSI+Stoch)/2 and this one.
Regards,
- Salil V Gangal
--- Ken Close <closeks@xxxx> wrote:
> Salil:
>
> Here is the formula:
>
> P1=14;
> Osc = EMA((RSI(P1)-LLV(RSI(P1),13))/(HHV(RSI(P1),13)-
> (LLV(RSI(P1),13))),3)*100;
>
> Whenever you see a Metastock MOV you look at the rest of the formula for
> whether it is simple or exponential
>
> Mov(C,10,S) is MA(C,10) in AB.
> Mov(C,10,E) is EMA(C,10) in AB.
>
> Ken
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Salil V Gangal [mailto:salil_gangal@x...]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 8:44 AM
> To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [amibroker] Question about 'CCT StochasticRSI'
>
>
> Hi Steve,
>
> My intent wasn't of course to find mistake. Was just going thru, saw it and
> wondered what it was !
>
> Questions about your revised formula ===>
>
> 1. What's 'Mov' in AFL ? Is it simple moving average ?
> 2. What's Mov(.....,3,E) ?
>
> Regards,
>
> - Salil V Gangal
>
>
> --- Steve Karnish <kernish@xxxx> wrote:
> > Salil,
> >
> > The correct formula is:
> >
> > Mov((RSI(13)-LLV(RSI(13),13))/
> > (HHV(RSI(13),13)- (LLV(RSI(13),13))),3,E)*100
> >
> > You are the first person, in three years, to notice the mistake.
> > Congratulations.
> >
> > Take care,
> >
> > Steve
> > www.cedarcreektrading.com
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Salil V Gangal <salil_gangal@xxxx>
> > To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 10:12 PM
> > Subject: [amibroker] Question about 'CCT StochasticRSI'
> >
> >
> > > Janeczko,
> > >
> > > I was going thru the AFL library and stumbled across 'CCT
> StochasticRSI'.
> > > (http://www.amibroker.com/library/detail.php?id=76) I also read the
> > original @
> > > http://www.cedarcreektrading.com/momenoscdef.htm
> > >
> > > Question ===>
> > >
> > > To me it looks like 'Normalized RSI over Period'. I wonder why is it
> > > 'StochasticRSI'. What's is 'Stochastic' about it ? Personally I use a
> > simple
> > > average of RSI(14) and Stochastic(9). The 'StochasticRSI' appears too
> > noisy in
> > > comparison.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > - Salil V Gangal
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
> > > http://taxes.yahoo.com/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
> http://taxes.yahoo.com/
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
http://taxes.yahoo.com/
|