|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
D,
I'd suggest both a best perspective, i.e the best possible of outcomes always leaving it to the best plus a simple first close
above/below L/H as a worst case. Its rough but with 3000+ Australian stock, 10,000 US?, XX,000 Greek there should be some
indicative results. And thats' all we're looking for, the best of the best.
P
----- Original Message -----
From: "DIMITRIS TSOKAKIS" <TSOKAKIS@xxxx>
To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2001 7:39 PM
Subject: [amibroker] Re: Candlestick-Analyzer
> See for example the discussion after an interesting question by David
> H. in #3742, #3744 until #3835, #3860, #3879 and others related to
> Bullish Harami.
> They were posted the ...ancient period of Amibroker 3.68.
> Replacing the Harami condition with another, you may check efficiency
> for any formation.
> Back testing here is a bit unusual, because each formation is a
> single "buy" or a single "sell".
> It is meaningless to BUY at bullish harami and SELL at evening star,
> so the only thing you can test is the result of a formation some days
> later.
> If there is any other idea to test a formation efficiency, please
> contribute.
> Dimitris Tsokakis
> --- In amibroker@xxxx, "server not recognized" <winchp@xxxx> wrote:
> A good few examples of
> > what they look like in a chart performing how they are supposed to
> work, but no substantial evaluation of success. So is it not
> > unreasonable to first check the validity? I think in AB it would
> be dead simple to access a score for each formation included and
> > backtest. I know that a commercial group has done exactly this and
> discovered that the results are less than great, and re-casting
> > the formations was necessary and the substance of their commercial
> offering.
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
|