|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Hi,
OK, you get what you have asked for...
I have just created AmiBroker Trading Systems group:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker-ts
Best regards,
Tomasz Janeczko
amibroker.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stephane Carrasset" <s.carrasset@xxxx>
To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 03 October, 2001 16:29
Subject: [amibroker] Re: Testing Projects Question #2
It is a great News!!
I agree to to the creation of a Backtesting group, yahoo has my
preference because of the message delivery.
I take subscription for a such backtesting group .
SStephane carrasset
>
> A fixed equity backtesting will be supported in 3.9 (end of
November 2001).
>
> Best regards,
> Tomasz Janeczko
> amibroker.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Stephane Carrasset" <s.carrasset@xxxx>
> To: <amibroker@xxxx>
> Sent: 03 October, 2001 15:46
> Subject: [amibroker] Re: Testing Projects Question #2
>
>
> I am fully OK for a testing group,
> - I can't be the leader because of my poor english, I write it like
> french language and sometimes I am totally misunderstood.
>
> - I think it must be a private group <=5 Persons ( previous
> experiences have showed me that two much people leads to noise)
>
> - The backtester of Amibroker has actually a limitation:
> it is a coumpound equity.
> a fixed equity would be more real life and could be manage the money
> with a stop loss adapted to your risk
> BUT TZ HAS PROMIZED AN UPGRADE ^__^
>
> -So, actually I go on backtesting a universe of stocks with a dll on
> MS.
>
> SC
>
>
>
> >
> > If a testing project gets goind, would it be best for it to be put
> an
> > a separate discussion board?
> >
> > I can see advantages for testing posts to be a separate board
> > dedicated to that. It would be easier to scan post titles.
> >
> > I can see advantages for testing posts to be on the current AB
> board.
> > Others might get curious, make the occassional helpful comment,
and
> > might join the testing project.
> >
> > What do others think?
> >
> > Tomasz, what do you think? Would it be easier for you to have
> testing
> > posts on a separate board which you likely would not need to look
> at
> > as often as you do for the main discussion board? I am assuming
> > testing posts would have not be discussing bugs, wish lists for
new
> > features, basic how-to questions, etc. Would you want to be the
> > formal owner/founder of any new board? I think having the
developer
> > as formal owner of this board contributes to its great success.
> >
> > b
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|