|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Dear Richard,
There is no reason to be sorry, it was obvious that you had
the math condition in mind.
Sometimes we are lucky, sometimes not.
Example : I was examining some relations re:volatility and
found a formula with logarithms.
Without checking AFL Help I wrote: S1=ln(X1), from the
habit of math formula. Everything worked fine,but the results
were poor and I left the study for another time.
Reading later AFL reference, I saw that the proper expression
for natural logarithm was S1=log(X1).
For an unknown reason, ln(X1) functioned equally.
But, it was an exception.
For built-in functions we have to follow exactly what is written
in AFL reference.
I appreciate your sensitivity.
Best Regards
Dimitris Tsokakis
--- In amibroker@xxxx, "Cloonan" <cloonan@xxxx> wrote:
> Dimitris,
>
> Sorry - your corrected formula is what was meant. (No excuses -
just
> sloppy and unchecked on my part) . The point I was really getting
at though
> was to use the trading variables to do a count of the occurrences
of a
> particular condition - then by changing the condition you can derive
> sufficient info to calculate the proportions.
>
> regards
> Richard
>
>
|